Quick Links

Is There a Gender Difference in Infarct Size and Arrhythmias Following Experimental Coronary Occlusion and Reperfusion?

Authors: Y Li|||RA Kloner

Journal: Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis

Publication Type: Journal Article

Date: 1995

DOI: 10.1007/BF01062713

ID: 10608027

Affiliations:

Affiliations

    Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California and Heart Institute, Hospital of the Good Samaritan, 616 South Witmer, Los Angeles, CA 90017.|||

Abstract

It has been suggested that there may be gender differences in the outcome of myocardial infarction and therapies. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the basic science of gender difference in the setting of experimental myocadial infarction. Therefore, we performed a randomized study to determine whether there is a gender-related difference in infarct size as well as arrhythmias in an experimental model of myocardial infarction. Eleven male and 10 female adult rats were studied. All rats underwent 90 minutes of left main coronary occlusion and 4 hours of reperfusion. After 4 hours of reperfusion, the area at risk (AR) was delineated by dye injection and the area of necrosis (AN) was assessed by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. The electrocardiogram was recorded for the incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF). The area at risk was similar between the two groups. Myocardial infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the area at risk, averaged 57.3 +/- 4.9% in male and 58.2 +/- 3.5% in female rats (p = NS). The incidences of VT and VF were similar between male and female rats during 90 minutes of ischemia. Thus, gender had no effect on the extent of myocardial injury in this model of ischemia/reperfusion. To the best of our knowledge this is the first prospective randomized experimental trial that has shown no effect of gender on myocardial infarct size.


Reference List

    Am J Cardiol. 1994 Feb 15;73(5):319-22|||Am J Pathol. 1985 Dec;121(3):522-30|||J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975 Feb;69(2):271-7|||Circulation. 1985 Aug;72(2):406-12|||N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 22;329(4):247-56|||N Engl J Med. 1992 Sep 3;327(10):669-77|||Ann Intern Med. 1990 Apr 15;112(8):561-7|||J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Mar;9(3):473-82|||West J Med. 1981 Jan;134(1):1-6|||JAMA. 1990 Feb 23;263(8):1092-6|||J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Sep;84(3):334-41|||Am J Physiol. 1989 Jun;256(6 Pt 2):H1719-25|||Circulation. 1991 Feb;83(2):484-91|||Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 1;120(7):559-66|||Am Heart J. 1984 Jul;108(1):63-6|||N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):221-5|||Circulation. 1993 Dec;88(6):2548-55|||Am J Cardiol. 1988 Jul 1;62(1):1-7|||Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Apr;119(4):610-23