Quick Links

Rotational Atherectomy and Stent Implantation for Calcified Left Main Lesions.

Authors: Bryan G Schwartz|||Guy S Mayeda|||Christina Economides|||Robert A Kloner|||David M Shavelle|||Steven Burstein

Journal: Cardiology research

Publication Type: Journal Article

Date: 2011

DOI: PMC5358280

ID: 28357008

Affiliations:

Affiliations

    Heart Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA.|||Department of Cardiology, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA.|||Department of Cardiology, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA.|||Heart Institute, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.|||Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.|||Department of Cardiology, Good Samaritan Hospital, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Abstract

Left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation and heavily calcified lesions are common and challenging to treat percutaneously. Rotational atherectomy (RA) may be beneficial in this setting to facilitate stent placement though direct supporting evidence is lacking. This study sought to analyze patients who underwent RA of the LMCA.


Reference List

    Capodanno D, Di Salvo ME, Cincotta G, Miano M, Tamburino C. Usefulness of the SYNTAX score for predicting clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(4):302–308.|||Kandzari DE, Colombo A, Park SJ, Tommaso CL, Ellis SG, Guzman LA, Teirstein PS. et al. Revascularization for unprotected left main disease: evolution of the evidence basis to redefine treatment standards. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(17):1576–1588. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.021.|||Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB III, Morrison DA. et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(1):e1–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.001.|||Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Moretti C, Meliga E, Agostoni P, Valgimigli M, Migliorini A. et al. A collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis on 1278 patients undergoing percutaneous drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2008;155(2):274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.009.|||Palmerini T, Sangiorgi D, Marzocchi A, Tamburino C, Sheiban I, Margheri M, Vecchi G. et al. Ostial and midshaft lesions vs. bifurcation lesions in 1111 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with drug-eluting stents: results of the survey from the Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(17):2087–2094. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp223.|||Tran T, Brown M, Lasala J. An evidence-based approach to the use of rotational and directional coronary atherectomy in the era of drug-eluting stents: when does it make sense? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72(5):650–662. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21676.|||Whitbourn RJ, Sethi R, Pomerantsev EV, Fitzgerald PJ. High-speed rotational atherectomy and coronary stenting: QCA and QCU analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;60(2):167–171. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10639.|||Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Popma JJ, Hong MK. et al. Comparative early and nine-month results of rotational atherectomy, stents, and the combination of both for calcified lesions in large coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(5):552–557. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00983-1.|||Henneke KH, Regar E, Konig A, Werner F, Klauss V, Metz J, Theisen K. et al. Impact of target lesion calcification on coronary stent expansion after rotational atherectomy. Am Heart J. 1999;137(1):93–99. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(99)70463-1.|||Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Satler LF, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Leon MB. Treatment of calcified coronary lesions with Palmaz-Schatz stents. An intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(8):1224–1231. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1998.1028.|||Schluter M, Cosgrave J, Tubler T, Melzi G, Colombo A, Schofer J. Rotational atherectomy to enable sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in calcified, nondilatable de novo coronary artery lesions. Vascular Disease Management. 2007;4(3):63–69.|||Sharma SK, Bhalla N, Dangas G, Duvvuri S, Kakarala V, Marmur JD, Cocke TP, Ambrose JA. Rotational atherectomy prior to coronary stenting prevents side branch occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997:498A.|||Tan RP, Kini A, Shalouh E, Marmur JD, Sharma SK. Optimal treatment of nonaorto ostial coronary lesions in large vessels: acute and long-term results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;54(3):283–288. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1285.|||Rathore S, Matsuo H, Terashima M, Kinoshita Y, Kimura M, Tsuchikane E, Nasu K. et al. Rotational atherectomy for fibro-calcific coronary artery disease in drug eluting stent era: procedural outcomes and angiographic follow-up results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75(6):919–927.|||Khattab AA, Otto A, Hochadel M, Toelg R, Geist V, Richardt G. Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents following rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified coronary lesions: late angiographic and clinical follow-up results. J Interv Cardiol. 2007;20(2):100–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2007.00243.x.|||Vaquerizo B, Serra A, Miranda F, Triano JL, Sierra G, Delgado G, Puentes A. et al. Aggressive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and/or cutting balloon before drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. J Interv Cardiol. 2010;23(3):240–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00547.x.|||Mezilis N, Dardas P, Ninios V, Tsikaderis D. Rotablation in the drug eluting era: immediate and long-term results from a single center experience. J Interv Cardiol. 2010;23(3):249–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00542.x.|||Clavijo LC, Steinberg DH, Torguson R, Kuchulakanti PK, Chu WW, Fournadjiev J, Satler LF. et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents and calcified coronary lesions: clinical outcomes of patients treated with and without rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68(6):873–878. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20615.|||Nayak AK, Davis R, Reddy HK, Krishnan MS, Voelker DJ, Aggarwal K. Left main coronary artery rotational atherectomy and stenting. South Med J. 2000;93(4):415–423.|||Kini AS. Coronary angiography, lesion classification and severity assessment. Cardiol Clin. 2006;24(2):153–162, v.|||Kiesz RS, Rozek MM, Ebersole DG, Mego DM, Chang CW, Chilton RL. Novel approach to rotational atherectomy results in low restenosis rates in long, calcified lesions: long-term results of the San Antonio Rotablator Study (SARS) Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;48(1):48–53. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199909)48:1<48::AID-CCD9>3.0.CO;2-Y.|||MacIsaac AI, Bass TA, Buchbinder M, Cowley MJ, Leon MB, Warth DC, Whitlow PL. High speed rotational atherectomy: outcome in calcified and noncalcified coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26(3):731–736. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00206-J.|||Wood F, Bazemore E, Schneider JE, Jobe RL, Mann T. Technique of left main stenting is dependent on lesion location and distal branch protection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;65(4):499–503. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20426.|||Mauri L, Reisman M, Buchbinder M, Popma JJ, Sharma SK, Cutlip DE, Ho KK. et al. Comparison of rotational atherectomy with conventional balloon angioplasty in the prevention of restenosis of small coronary arteries: results of the Dilatation vs Ablation Revascularization Trial Targeting Restenosis (DART) Am Heart J. 2003;145(5):847–854. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00080-2.|||Whitlow PL, Bass TA, Kipperman RM, Sharaf BL, Ho KK, Cutlip DE, Zhang Y. et al. Results of the study to determine rotablator and transluminal angioplasty strategy (STRATAS) Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(6):699–705. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01486-7.|||vom Dahl J, Dietz U, Haager PK, Silber S, Niccoli L, Buettner HJ, Schiele F. et al. Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST) Circulation. 2002;105(5):583–588. doi: 10.1161/hc0502.103347.|||Moussa I, Di Mario C, Moses J, Reimers B, Di Francesco L, Martini G, Tobis J. et al. Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results. Circulation. 1997;96(1):128–136.